Surina v. NuScale Power, LLC

• Court: District Court, D. Oregon
• Decided: June 23, 2024
• Docket: 3:22-cv-01410
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JOHN J. SURINA, JR, trustee of the Elizabeth No. 3:22-cv-01410-YY Sophia Surina Trust and Nicholas William Surina Trust; BRUCE LANDREY, an individual; PAUL ORDER LORENZINI, an individual; RICHARD SANDVIK, an individual; EDWARD G. WALLACE, an individual; JACK A. BAILEY, an individual; GARY CARL BARBOUR, an individual; PAUL D. BENNETT, an individual; JAMES E. CARTER, an individual; CHARLES MARCINKIEWICZ, trustee of the Charles & Kathleen Marcinkiewicz Trust; MICHAEL S. MCGOUGH, an individual; CHRISTOPHER RUNCKEL, an individual; and JOE CLAYTON TURNAGE, an individual; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NUSCALE POWER, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company; FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation; JAPAN NUSCALE INNOVATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; SARGENT & LUNDY NUHOLDINGS, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company,

Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation on May 22, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint. F&R, ECF 71. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [71]. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint [63] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________J_u_n_e_ _2_3_,_ 2_0__2_4_____.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge