SURICO v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

SURICO v. State

68 So. 3d 373, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13353, 2011 WL 3687437

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 2011·No. 4D10-2144·Published

Opinion

*374 PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a new motion to correct illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), expressly alleging where in the records it can be demonstrated that she is entitled to jail time credit (as opposed to drug farm time served for which she would not be entitled to credit) and identifying in which lower court case number the credit applies. See Cabrera v. State, 62 So.3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); see also Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

WARNER, STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*374 PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a new motion to correct illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), expressly alleging where in the records it can be demonstrated that she is entitled to jail time credit (as opposed to drug farm time served for which she would not be entitled to credit) and identifying in which lower court case number the credit applies. See Cabrera v. State, 62 So.3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); see also Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

WARNER, STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

SURICO v. State, 68 So. 3d 373, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13353, 2011 WL 3687437 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

68 So. 3d 373 (SURICO v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related