Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/SURICO v. State

SURICO v. State

68 So. 3d 373, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13353, 2011 WL 3687437
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 2011
Docket4D10-2144
StatusPublished

This text of 68 So. 3d 373 (SURICO v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SURICO v. State, 68 So. 3d 373, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13353, 2011 WL 3687437 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

*374 PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a new motion to correct illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), expressly alleging where in the records it can be demonstrated that she is entitled to jail time credit (as opposed to drug farm time served for which she would not be entitled to credit) and identifying in which lower court case number the credit applies. See Cabrera v. State, 62 So.3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); see also Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

WARNER, STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cabrera v. State
62 So. 3d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 So. 3d 373, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13353, 2011 WL 3687437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surico-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.