Surgifix Inc v. First Medical Health Plan, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico·Decided February 14, 2019·No. 17-00202·Unknown

Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2

4 IN RE: CASE NO. 15-05227 BKT 5 6 SURGIFIX INC Chapter 7

7 Adversary No. 17-00202 8 9 Debtor(s)

10 SURGIFIX INC 11

12 Plaintiff 13 vs.

14 FIRST MEDICAL HEALTH PLAN, INC. 15 16 Defendant(s) FILED & ENTERED ON 02/14/2019 17 NOREEN WISCOVITCH RENTAS, 18 TRUSTEE OF THE CHAPTER 7 ESTATE 19 OF SURGIFIX

21 OPINION & ORDER 22 23 Before the court is Defendant First Medical Health Plan, Inc.’s (hereinafter “First Medical” or 24 “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment and for Other Relief [Dkt. No. 30]; the Chapter 7 25 Trustee Noreen Wiscovitch Rentas’ (hereinafter “Trustee”) Opposition to Defendant’s Request for

1 1 Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 45]; and First Medical’s Reply to Docket No. 45 [Dkt. No. 49]. For the 2 reasons stated below, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and for Other Relief [Dkt. No. 3 30] is DENIED. 4 5 First Medical argues in its motion for summary judgment that the Trustee has failed to prove 6 that it owes monies to Debtor Surgifix, Inc.’s (hereinafter “Debtor”) estate. As such the Trustee’s 7 request for the return of approximately $14,436.60 to its estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 542(b) cannot 8 9 succeed.1 Defendant bases its argument on the fact that the Trustee has not presented sufficient, 10 competent evidence to enable a finding in her favor and defeat summary judgment. Consequently, 11 First Medical requests that the court dismiss the Trustee’s action for the return of $14,436.60, with 12 13 prejudice, under both section 542 and Puerto Rico law, and further that attorney’s fees and costs 14 associated with First Medical’s defense be awarded. 15 The Trustee’s opposition is based on First Medical’s lack of evidence to prove that no monies 16 17 are owed to the estate. Defendant alleges that the insurance policy with regard to certain patients did not 18 cover Debtor’s orthopedic equipment due to excess fees, lack of coverage and/or failure to follow 19 procedures. The insurance policies that govern the payments claimed in the instant complaint have not 20 21 been provided by the Defendant. This documentation is necessary to determine whether the medical 22 invoices submitted comply with the terms of the insurance policy. 23 After reviewing the arguments of the parties, and the relevant law, this court concludes that 24 25 there is a genuine issue as to a material fact, specifically, whether the policies in place provided for

1 In the Complaint commencing this adversary proceeding [Dkt. No. 1], the Trustee states that in the alternative, this collection of monies action may also proceed pursuant to Puerto Rico law, section 1041, 31 L.P.R.A. section 2991 and 2992. 2 1 || the coverage that was denied, and whether First Medical properly reviewed and denied each clai according to their established procedure. This is a material fact that mandates an evidentiary hearing| 4 || Accordingly, the moving party is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 5 As to the attorney fees and costs requested by Defendant, the same are denied. "Th ‘American Rule’ is that each party bears its own attorney’s fees and litigation expenses." Castellano

g || Grp. Law Firm, L.L.C. v. FDIC (MJS Las Croabas Props.), 545 B.R. 401, 417 (Bankr.D.P.R. 2016) > |! citing New Eng. Surfaces v. E.l. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 558 F. Supp. 2d 116, 122 (D. Me. 2008 (citing Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Soc'y, 421 U.S. 240 (1975)). A court may gran 12 compensation for attorney’s fees when an attorney or other person multiplies the proceedings in an 13 case unreasonably and vexatiously. 28 U.S.C. $1927. That is not the situation in this advers proceeding. First Medical has not provided any evidence to support its allegation that the Trustee ha 16 || failed to exercise proper due diligence in her pursuit of this turnover action. 1 WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and fo Other Relief [Dkt. No. 30] shall be, and hereby is, DENIED. The Clerk shall schedule a pre-tria 20 || hearing, with the joint pretrial report to be filed seven (7) days prior to said hearing. First Medical’ 21 request for attorney fees and costs is denied. 22 93 SO ORDERED 24 San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 14th day of February, 2019. 25 = oe Vie Brian K. Tester U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Surgifix Inc v. First Medical Health Plan, Inc., (prb 2019).

Surgifix Inc v. First Medical Health Plan, Inc. (Surgifix Inc v. First Medical Health Plan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related