Surgical Design Corp. v. Correa

309 A.D.2d 800, 765 N.Y.S.2d 521
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In related actions, inter alia, to recover corporate property and funds, the defendants in Action No. 1 appeal, by permission, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated August 26, 2002, which, among other things, sua sponte appointed a private attorney to be compensated by the parties to serve as a referee to oversee discovery.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof which sua sponte appointed a private attorney to be compensated by the parties to serve as a referee to oversee discovery; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the appointment of a Judicial Hearing Officer to serve as a referee.

The Supreme Court lacked the authority to appoint a private attorney to serve as a referee to oversee discovery, and to be compensated by the parties, without their consent (see CPLR 3104; Csanko v County of Westchester, 273 AD2d 434 [2000]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Surgical Design Corp. v. Correa, 309 A.D.2d 800, 765 N.Y.S.2d 521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

309 A.D.2d 800 (Surgical Design Corp. v. Correa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Llorente v. City of New York
60 A.D.3d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)