Surgan v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Surgan v. Silverman

32 A.D.2d 802, 302 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 802 (Surgan v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Surgan v. Silverman, 32 A.D.2d 802, 302 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for nomination for the public office of Councilman for the 23d Council-manic District, Kings County, 'City of New York, the appeal is from an order of the 'Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 9, 1969', which granted the application and enjoined the respondent Board of Elections accordingly. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs; the designating petitions are adjudged to be valid; and petition in the proceeding dismissed. In our opinion, the evidence did not warrant the conclusions that fraud permeated the designating petitions or that the candidate participated in .the irregularities which [803]*803may have accompanied the solicitation of signatures. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for nomination for the public office of Councilman for the 23d Council-manic District, Kings County, 'City of New York, the appeal is from an order of the 'Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 9, 1969', which granted the application and enjoined the respondent Board of Elections accordingly. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs; the designating petitions are adjudged to be valid; and petition in the proceeding dismissed. In our opinion, the evidence did not warrant the conclusions that fraud permeated the designating petitions or that the candidate participated in .the irregularities which [803]*803may have accompanied the solicitation of signatures. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 802, 302 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surgan-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1969.