Surety Credit Co. v. Foucheaux

119 So. 444, 10 La. App. 6, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 372
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 7, 1929
DocketNo. 11,497
StatusPublished

This text of 119 So. 444 (Surety Credit Co. v. Foucheaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Surety Credit Co. v. Foucheaux, 119 So. 444, 10 La. App. 6, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 372 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit on a promissory note. Tke defendant pleads payment. He is corroborated, in part, by the admission that the note was marked “paid” by plaintiff and mailed to defendant.

Tke sending of tke “paid note” is explained as a mistake. Several employees of the plaintiff company including the manager and cashier testified to that effect. There is no evidence to the contrary, other than tke admission referred to. There is a clear preponderance of evidence in favor of plaintiff, consequently the judgment appealed from must be, as it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 So. 444, 10 La. App. 6, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surety-credit-co-v-foucheaux-lactapp-1929.