Surdi v. Jameco Operating Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Surdi v. Jameco Operating Corp.

44 N.Y. 849

DecidedMay 11, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.Y. 849 (Surdi v. Jameco Operating Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Surdi v. Jameco Operating Corp., 44 N.Y. 849 (N.Y. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Motions to dismiss the appeal herein granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved, and upon the ground that the modification at the Appellate Division does not aggrieve appellant and is not substantial (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]) since Special Term, [850]*850in its February 8, 1977 order on respondent Maspeth Federal Savings and Loan Association’s motion to renew, had previously dismissed plaintiff’s complaint as against Maspeth Federal Savings and Loan Association.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motions to dismiss the appeal herein granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved, and upon the ground that the modification at the Appellate Division does not aggrieve appellant and is not substantial (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]) since Special Term, [850]*850in its February 8, 1977 order on respondent Maspeth Federal Savings and Loan Association’s motion to renew, had previously dismissed plaintiff’s complaint as against Maspeth Federal Savings and Loan Association.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 N.Y. 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surdi-v-jameco-operating-corp-ny-1978.