Surdakowski v. State

123 So. 3d 158, 2013 WL 5676634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16653
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2013·No. No. 1D13-4480·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that ha-beas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised [159]*159on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).

WOLF, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Surdakowski v. State, 123 So. 3d 158, 2013 WL 5676634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16653 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

123 So. 3d 158 (Surdakowski v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)