Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Surdakowski v. State

Surdakowski v. State

123 So. 3d 158, 2013 WL 5676634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16653
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2013
DocketNo. 1D13-4480
StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 3d 158 (Surdakowski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Surdakowski v. State, 123 So. 3d 158, 2013 WL 5676634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16653 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that ha-beas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised [159]*159on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).

WOLF, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 3d 158, 2013 WL 5676634, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surdakowski-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.