Surber v. Hood

Missouri Court of Appeals

Surber v. Hood

228 S.W.3d 602, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1027

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 10, 2007·No. No. WD 67648·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Hood (“Father”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Saline County terminating his parental rights to K.N.H. and J.D.H. and granting a petition filed by the children’s mother, Nancy Surber (“Mother”), and her current husband, Larry Surber (“Stepfather”), to adopt those children. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by the evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Hood (“Father”) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Saline County terminating his parental rights to K.N.H. and J.D.H. and granting a petition filed by the children’s mother, Nancy Surber (“Mother”), and her current husband, Larry Surber (“Stepfather”), to adopt those children. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by the evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Surber v. Hood, 228 S.W.3d 602, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1027 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

228 S.W.3d 602 (Surber v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related