Surat v. New York State Board of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Surat v. New York State Board of Parole

77 A.D.2d 963, 432 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 A.D.2d 963 (Surat v. New York State Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Surat v. New York State Board of Parole, 77 A.D.2d 963, 432 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant for reargument of the motion to vacate the automatic stay which was granted by order of this court, dated April 24, 1980, in connection with the appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered February 21, 1980. On the court’s own motion, the judgment is summarily reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements and the matter is remanded to Special Term, Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for the purpose of passing upon petitioner’s other contentions which were not passed upon in its prior decision. (Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69.) Motion for reargument dismissed as academic. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant for reargument of the motion to vacate the automatic stay which was granted by order of this court, dated April 24, 1980, in connection with the appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered February 21, 1980. On the court’s own motion, the judgment is summarily reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements and the matter is remanded to Special Term, Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for the purpose of passing upon petitioner’s other contentions which were not passed upon in its prior decision. (Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69.) Motion for reargument dismissed as academic. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 963, 432 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surat-v-new-york-state-board-of-parole-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack