Suprenant v. Kuhn

Connecticut Appellate Court

Suprenant v. Kuhn

673 A.2d 585, 40 Conn. App. 751, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 156

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 26, 1996

Docket14359

StatusPublished

This text of 673 A.2d 585 (Suprenant v. Kuhn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Suprenant v. Kuhn, 673 A.2d 585, 40 Conn. App. 751, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 156 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered for the plaintiffs awarding $2500 damages. They claim that the trial court improperly based its decision on an issue not raised in the pleadings, and abused its discretion in making certain findings. The defendants have failed to present a written memorandum of decision or a transcribed copy of an oral decision signed by the court explaining the factual basis for its decision. See Practice Book § 4059. We have consistently stated that it is the responsibility of the appellant to provide an adequate record for review. Practice Book § 4061; Gelormino v. Blaustein, 31 Conn. App. 750, 751, 626 A.2d 1325 (1993); State v. Rios, 30 Conn. App. 712, 715, 622 A.2d 618 (1993).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered for the plaintiffs awarding $2500 damages. They claim that the trial court improperly based its decision on an issue not raised in the pleadings, and abused its discretion in making certain findings. The defendants have failed to present a written memorandum of decision or a transcribed copy of an oral decision signed by the court explaining the factual basis for its decision. See Practice Book § 4059. We have consistently stated that it is the responsibility of the appellant to provide an adequate record for review. Practice Book § 4061; Gelormino v. Blaustein, 31 Conn. App. 750, 751, 626 A.2d 1325 (1993); State v. Rios, 30 Conn. App. 712, 715, 622 A.2d 618 (1993).

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 A.2d 585, 40 Conn. App. 751, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suprenant-v-kuhn-connappct-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack