Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur v. Cosgrove
169 S.W. 999, 161 Ky. 484, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 2
Opinion
Extended Opinion by
Upon reconsideration of the question, we conclude that the affidavit of Dr. O. H. Kilsall, which was read as his deposition, is sufficient to admit evidence that the de[485]*485ceased used intoxicants as therein supposed, and. such evidence should have been admitted on the trial with an admonition to the jury as to the purpose for which it should be considered.
The opinion is extended as indicated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur v. Cosgrove, 169 S.W. 999, 161 Ky. 484, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 2 (Ky. Ct. App. 1914).
169 S.W. 999 (Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur v. Cosgrove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grand Lodge, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Johnson
15 S.W.2d 499 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)