Supreme Lodge v. Grand Lodge

213 F. 937, 130 C.C.A. 343, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 1914
DocketNo. 4060
StatusPublished

This text of 213 F. 937 (Supreme Lodge v. Grand Lodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Supreme Lodge v. Grand Lodge, 213 F. 937, 130 C.C.A. 343, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963 (8th Cir. 1914).

Opinion

CARLAND, Circuit Judge.

Supreme Lodge, Ancient Order of United Workmen, hereafter called'Supreme Lodge, brought this action [938]*938against the Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of Minnesota, hereafter called Grand Lodge, for an accounting as to all moneys collected and received by the latter for the use and benefit of the former with reference to a guaranty and fraternal aid fund, and a per capita tax, and judgment for the amount found to be due. The Grand Lodge denied liability, and on final hearing the bill was dismissed for the reason that it did not appear that the Grand Lodge had established any such funds or collected any money for said funds to which the Supreme Lodge had any claim. The facts which condition the liability of the Grand L°dge t° the Supreme Lodge are as follows:

The Supreme Lodge is a fraternal beneficial society, incorporated under the laws of Texas. The Grand Lodge is a fraternal beneficial society, incorporated under the laws of Minnesota. Prior to January 24, 1877, the Supreme Lodge caused to be organized subordinate lodges, having more than 2,000 members, in the State of Minnesota, and on or about March 15, 1878, the Supreme Lodge, in accordance with its constitution, laws, rules, and regulations, set apart the Grand Lodge as a separate beneficiary jurisdiction. The Grand Lodge continued as a separate beneficiary jurisdiction and carried on its business as a voluntary unincorporated beneficiary association until the year 1902, when it -was incorporated under the laws of Minnesota. Since said time, when the Grand Lodge was so set apart as a separate beneficiary jurisdiction, the Supreme Lodge has also conducted a beneficiary jurisdiction distinct and separate from the beneficiary business of the Grand Lodge.

Since the Grand Lodge was set apart as a separate beneficiary jurisdiction, it has organized within the state of Minnesota more than 260 subordinate lodges with a membership of over 20,000, and during such time no subordinate lodge has been organized within the state of Minnesota except those organized by the Grand Lodge. During all of said time the Grand Lodge has, in accordance with its constitution and laws and articles of incorporation, determined the necessity for and number of beneficiary assessments to be levied upon the members within the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge, and the amount of money required for the payment of claims against the beneficiary fund of said lodge, the form and sufficiency of proofs of death of members of said lodge, allowance and payment of claims against the beneficiary fund and against the general fund of said lodge, the necessity for and the amount of money to be expended in promoting the interest of the Grand Lodge and extending its membership in the state of Minnesota, and in general has conducted its business affairs as seemed best to the Grand Lodge and its officers.

The Grand Lodge since its organization has sent representatives to and has been represented in each session of the Supreme Lodge, as provided in the constitution and laws of the Supreme Lodge and Grand Lodge, until and including the session of said Supreme Lodge held in December, 1910.

At the session of said Grand Lodge held in February, 1911, it adopted a resolution that it should at once sever all connection with said Supreme Lodge and directed its committee on laws to prepare and [939]*939submit amendments to its Grand Lodge constitution and its certificate of incorporation to carry the resolution into full force and effect. Pursuant to the resolution such amendments were submitted and adopted.

The articles of incorporation, of the Grand Lodge contain the.following certificate: ,

“This is to ce'rtify, that, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 2 of the General Laws of the state of Minnesota; for A. D. 1901, the Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of Minnesota, heretofore instituted and authorized in the state of Minnesota under the authority of the Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen, and now located in said state, desiring to become a body corporate, and having so determined by a two-thirds vote of all its members present and voting thereon at a regular meeting of the same convened and in session at the city of St. Paul, in said state, on the 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st days of February, A. D. 1902, and having by the same vote at the same meeting adopted and caused to be prepared' this certificate, to that end doth further certify:
“First. The name finder which this body was instituted and chartered by the Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen, which shall also be its corporate name as provided by said act, was ‘the Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of Minnesota.’
“Second. The date this body was instituted was the 24th day of January, A. D. 1S77, and the date of the charter issued to it is the 30th day of June, A. D. 1882.”

Also the following language:

“All the powers of this body, pertaining to the welfare of said Ancient Order of United Workmen, that are enumerated herein, are subject to the supervisory control of said Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen when in session, and of the executive officers thereof when the same is not in session.”

The constitution of the Grand Lodge contains the following sections :

“See. 3. Its governing bodies are: (1) The ‘Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen,’ which is a corporation duly created, organized and existing under and pursuant to the laws of the state of Texas, and which has general supervision and jurisdiction over the whole order, with such powers over, the whole order, including this body, as may be from time to time set forth in its corporate charter, its constitution and general laws, and conformable to the law of the land. (2) Grand Lodges, of which this body is one, and which owe their existence to, and receive their power and authority as a part of said order, from charters severally issued to them by the Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen aforesaid, and which Grand Lodges have supervision and control over the said order within certain territorial limits prescribed by the said Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen, as may be from time to time set forth in the corporate charter, and the constitution and general laws of the said Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen, and conformable to the law of the land.”
“Sec. 6. Powers of This Grand Lodge. All the powers of this Grand Lodge pertaining to the welfare of said order, that áre enumerated in this section, are subject to the supervisory control of said Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen when in session, and of the executive officers thereof when the same is not in session.”

In 1880 the Supreme Lodge, in order to protect each beneficiary jurisdiction of the order from exigencies which might arise, increasing its death rate to an extent which would make assessments for a time [940]*940oppressive upon its membership, established a fund known as the relief fund. In 1900 the law of the Supreme Lodge, establishing a relief fund, was amended and the name of the fund changed to guaranty fund. In 1903 the so-called relief law and guaranty fund was again amended by the Supreme Lodge. This amendment, so far as material, reads as follows:

“1. How Raised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 F. 937, 130 C.C.A. 343, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/supreme-lodge-v-grand-lodge-ca8-1914.