Supreme Court'S Opinion In Carter v. State, 952 S.W.2D 417 (Tenn. 1997).

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Supreme Court'S Opinion In Carter v. State, 952 S.W.2D 417 (Tenn. 1997).

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

DecidedDecember 1, 2010

Docket01C01-9711-CR-00530

StatusPublished

This text of Supreme Court'S Opinion In Carter v. State, 952 S.W.2D 417 (Tenn. 1997). (Supreme Court'S Opinion In Carter v. State, 952 S.W.2D 417 (Tenn. 1997).) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Supreme Court'S Opinion In Carter v. State, 952 S.W.2D 417 (Tenn. 1997)., (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STEVE KOPROWSKI, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9711-CR-00530 Appellant, ) ) PUTNAM COUNTY VS. ) (No. 86-377-F Below) ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) The Hon. Leon C. Burns, Jr. ) Appellee. ) (Denial of Post-Conviction Relief)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the state's motion to affirm the judgment

of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The

petitioner is appealing the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief as time-

barred by the statute of limitations.

As conceded by the petitioner, he is not entitled to relief based on our

Supreme Court’s opinion in Carter v. State, 952 S.W.2d 417 (Tenn. 1997).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is

affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules. Costs are

taxed to the appellant.

ENTER, this the ____ day of February, 1998.

_____________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_____________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

_____________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI