Supreme Council A. A. S. R. v. Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. M.

166 N.C. 221
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 22, 1914·Published

Opinion

Pee CuRiam.

The position taken in the defendant’s brief that the appeal is premature must be sustained. Goodwin v. Fertilizer Works, 123 N. C., 162.

If we were to hold otherwise, parties could appeal from every adverse ruling-in the Superior Court, with the result that the docket of this Court would be incumbered with unnecessary matter, the costs to litigants greatly increased, and trials needlessly delayed.

An exception ought to have been .entered and the trial proceeded with.

We are, however, of opinion that the motion to amend was properly denied.

If the facts alleged therein are competent against the defendant as evidence of malice, they may be offered under the allegations of the original complaint; and if relied on as a cause of action, they introduce a new and distinct cause of action, which is not permissiblé, when resisted. McNair v. Buncombe County, 93 N. C., 364; Clendennin v. Turner, 96 N. C., 416.

Appeal dismissed.

Claek, O. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Supreme Council A. A. S. R. v. Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. M., 166 N.C. 221 (N.C. 1914).

166 N.C. 221 (Supreme Council A. A. S. R. v. Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Clendenin v. Turner
2 S.E. 51 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887)
McNair v. . Comrs. of Buncombe County
93 N.C. 364 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)
State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer Works
31 S.E. 373 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)