Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 742 F.3d 1350
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 17, 2012·No. 2012-1170·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

Um'ted States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

SUPREMA, INC. AND MENTALIX, INC., Appellants,

V.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,

AND CROSS MATCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Intervenor. '

2012-1170

On appeal from the United States International Trade Cornmission in Investigation No. 337-TA-720.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Up0n consideration of Google Inc.’s motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief,

IT lS ORDERED THATZ

SUPREMA V. ITC 2

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

AY 1 n 7 /sf Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk

cc: Darryl M. Wo0, Esq. Clint A. Gerdine, Esq. Maxiniilian A. Grant, Esq.

Daryl Joseff`er, Esq. F|LED U.S. CUUBT OF AFPEALS FUH 521 me FEnEnAL consult

|"|AY 17 2012 -~ JAN HDBBAL¥ CLEHK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.