Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
Um'ted States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
SUPREMA, INC. AND MENTALIX, INC., Appellants,
V.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,
AND CROSS MATCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Intervenor. '
2012-1170
On appeal from the United States International Trade Cornmission in Investigation No. 337-TA-720.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Up0n consideration of Google Inc.’s motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief,
IT lS ORDERED THATZ
SUPREMA V. ITC 2
The motion is granted.
FOR THE COURT
AY 1 n 7 /sf Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk
cc: Darryl M. Wo0, Esq. Clint A. Gerdine, Esq. Maxiniilian A. Grant, Esq.
Daryl Joseff`er, Esq. F|LED U.S. CUUBT OF AFPEALS FUH 521 me FEnEnAL consult
|"|AY 17 2012 -~ JAN HDBBAL¥ CLEHK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.