Supranovich (Thomas) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 2019·No. 79444·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THOMAS MATTHEW SUPRANOVICH, No. 79444 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, F 1 LI E Respondent.

SEP 1 8 2019 ELI BROWN CLE

-ME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY CEPUTY CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to compel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo u. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Pickering

Ade. J.

J.

-C244)""lajar111.737 Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge Thomas Matthew Supranovich Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4K1e#.

W414)

•.1"

;?r,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Supranovich (Thomas) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Supranovich (Thomas) Vs. State (Supranovich (Thomas) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)