Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Supplee v. Hallanan

Supplee v. Hallanan

8 A.D.2d 708, 185 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 12, 1959
StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 708 (Supplee v. Hallanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Supplee v. Hallanan, 8 A.D.2d 708, 185 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Judgment and order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of the Statute of Frauds under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice unanimously affirmed, with costs to defendant-respondent. (See Harris v. Home Ind. Co., 6 A D 2d 861.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ. [14 Misc 2d 658.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Supplee v. Hallanan
14 Misc. 2d 658 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 708, 185 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/supplee-v-hallanan-nyappdiv-1959.