Supolski v. Ferguson & Lange Foundry Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Supolski v. Ferguson & Lange Foundry Co.

193 Ill. App. 79

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 10, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,990

StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ill. App. 79 (Supolski v. Ferguson & Lange Foundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Supolski v. Ferguson & Lange Foundry Co., 193 Ill. App. 79 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Master and servant, § 158*—when safeguard of dangerous appliance practicable. In an action by an employee to recover for injuries caused through being struck by pieces flying from a pile of scrap iron, which was being broken by dropping on it from a considerable height a heavy iron ball, evidence examined and held to support a finding that it was practicable to safeguard employees against the flying pieces by some surer means than a shanty six or ten feet from the drop and seven feet high. 4. Appeal and error, § 1565*—when modification of improper in-' struction harmless. One who has requested an improper instruction cannot complain of a doubtful modification of it by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Master and servant, § 158*—when safeguard of dangerous appliance practicable. In an action by an employee to recover for injuries caused through being struck by pieces flying from a pile of scrap iron, which was being broken by dropping on it from a considerable height a heavy iron ball, evidence examined and held to support a finding that it was practicable to safeguard employees against the flying pieces by some surer means than a shanty six or ten feet from the drop and seven feet high. 4. Appeal and error, § 1565*—when modification of improper in-' struction harmless. One who has requested an improper instruction cannot complain of a doubtful modification of it by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 Ill. App. 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/supolski-v-ferguson-lange-foundry-co-illappct-1915.