Supino v. Long Sands Grocery Store

Maine Superior

Supino v. Long Sands Grocery Store

DecidedMarch 7, 2006

DocketYORre-05-005

StatusUnpublished

This text of Supino v. Long Sands Grocery Store (Supino v. Long Sands Grocery Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Supino v. Long Sands Grocery Store, (Me. Super. Ct. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

S i iPE13103 <:Oiii

1,ONG SANIJS GROCERY STORE ,I

Catne on (his day to be l~earclPlaintifi'c molion Sor partial summary judgment, on Count 11 of the Complaint (Quiet Title). P1aintiEfh;rs nlovecl the Court for summary judgment on the grouncis ihai he has a 14 feet wide and 100 Cecr long enselllent by implication and prescription over Defendant's land i~nmediatelyabutting I'laintiff s property. - Having duly considered Plaintiffs motion, statemeilt of rmdisputed material facts, and the Defendant's opposition, and finding that this case fklls within the class of implied easements recognized by Young 11. Rrarn~nz,75 A. 120, 12 1, 105 Me. 494 (1909) and Brown v. Dickey, 75 A. 3 82, 3 84, 106 Me. 9 7 (1 90 9) a 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 a ~ P l a ~ i ~ n t i ~ f ~ - 1 - 1 a $ 1 - . s l ~ ~ ~7'# h ~-P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tdaeasement&e-Court will GRANT tile n~otioliand ENTER summary judgment in PlaintilY's favor on Count I1 of the Complaint. W~1ifiiSi'-skaILproxide.to.~t~~e..~~e~-1dan&a propasgd-easeme~~eedwit-lii,2Q-tla@e.i-lo ~ ~ v i ~ l ~ - ~ ~ d a . t ~ o f - t ~ ~ff-shallreru-icxb .k~r~r;~ainti g o s t M B i - t k A w y e e r m ~ ~ ~ ~ e ; - a r r b - D exemtea-dee&e-a, ~ ~ f i a - f f P &.P pa8~agewa~1-4-fiehvide-an'd--l-0~e'e5~~o~g~jTl~Tef~ili3U71~~~@0~~ t hc-ciateal'-thisOrder,.Il'-, the prties-~~e-~tnal~ieto-a-~~;-tt'tergoteas-c~-hrtl~-e~~nferenee;-tl~fPl-im~tif~i lI-prwide--tothe-Gourt, the p~oposal- I I.!(- (1: easem~nt---d~ed-L'o~r~~te~~ie~~~~'i~nd ourt-v~ill-~11ti;l:a-lilr ther order as.mil~&e_ appl~op~ial.~ D ,,,&u,, 4~sde ,-; i .<.ZA&*,- ~ 7 7; c ~ ~ , ~ R ~ + L r i .%'.Af,- 9.. & . a hup~ i--~;(i -.,,@ a h k d . < . t .: - \J , ----". LLC..&~;. 2 n . -. / ub . PAC. klcGJd -llel-.eby-PEKMANISNTL;Y-Eft'3~01NEY3-'fidfi F~u:tl~ei:;..L>ef~~dunt-iu inttrferirig I ith-.or-- ob.i;[ruslil~gin anymanncrllqe -abtwe-referenc;~:+l "l;~-fcct-wide anct -100 -fket long easement and shall i1n1ilediateiyre1iiim-e-any~Kg3i~tI:i:c~tjonsfi'n1n-tIrat ease~nelil.

. . . ..... ... . .. .I!.. . . . . Sigmund D. S c h u t z , E s q . - PL ~

ust,ce, ,.,I,, .<. ,I ,".I, , r~ \ _ L ~,, I, c~ ~ i l :,~,. i ~r~ it f ~i u ~ ~ ~ 1 . 1 , , , ~) nn I C , I

John McVeigh, Esq. - PIJ Jants 0aTtlett, Ess. - 111 I060lLJ6 I

~~Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI~~

~~S i iPE13103 <:Oiii~~

~~1,ONG SANIJS GROCERY STORE ,I~~

Catne on (his day to be l~earclPlaintifi'c molion Sor partial summary judgment, on Count 11 of the Complaint (Quiet Title). P1aintiEfh;rs nlovecl the Court for summary judgment on the grouncis ihai he has a 14 feet wide and 100 Cecr long enselllent by implication and prescription over Defendant's land i~nmediatelyabutting I'laintiff s property. - Having duly considered Plaintiffs motion, statemeilt of rmdisputed material facts, and the Defendant's opposition, and finding that this case fklls within the class of implied easements recognized by Young 11. Rrarn~nz,75 A. 120, 12 1, 105 Me. 494 (1909) and Brown v. Dickey, 75 A. 3 82, 3 84, 106 Me. 9 7 (1 90 9) a 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 a ~ P l a ~ i ~ n t i ~ f ~ - 1 - 1 a $ 1 - . s l ~ ~ ~7'# h ~-P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tdaeasement&e-Court will GRANT tile n~otioliand ENTER summary judgment in PlaintilY's favor on Count I1 of the Complaint. W~1ifiiSi'-skaILproxide.to.~t~~e..~~e~-1dan&a propasgd-easeme~~eedwit-lii,2Q-tla@e.i-lo ~ ~ v i ~ l ~ - ~ ~ d a . t ~ o f - t ~ ~ff-shallreru-icxb .k~r~r;~ainti g o s t M B i - t k A w y e e r m ~ ~ ~ ~ e ; - a r r b - D exemtea-dee&e-a, ~ ~ f i a - f f P &.P pa8~agewa~1-4-fiehvide-an'd--l-0~e'e5~~o~g~jTl~Tef~ili3U71~~~@0~~ t hc-ciateal'-thisOrder,.Il'-, the prties-~~e-~tnal~ieto-a-~~;-tt'tergoteas-c~-hrtl~-e~~nferenee;-tl~fPl-im~tif~i lI-prwide--tothe-Gourt, the p~oposal- I I.!(- (1: easem~nt---d~ed-L'o~r~~te~~ie~~~~'i~nd ourt-v~ill-~11ti;l:a-lilr ther order as.mil~&e_ appl~op~ial.~ D ,,,&u,, 4~sde ,-; i .<.ZA&*,- ~ 7 7; c ~ ~ , ~ R ~ + L r i .%'.Af,- 9.. & . a hup~ i--~;(i -.,,@ a h k d . < . t .: - \J , ----". LLC..&~;. 2 n . -. / ub . PAC. klcGJd -llel-.eby-PEKMANISNTL;Y-Eft'3~01NEY3-'fidfi F~u:tl~ei:;..L>ef~~dunt-iu inttrferirig I ith-.or-- ob.i;[ruslil~gin anymanncrllqe -abtwe-referenc;~:+l "l;~-fcct-wide anct -100 -fket long easement and shall i1n1ilediateiyre1iiim-e-any~Kg3i~tI:i:c~tjonsfi'n1n-tIrat ease~nelil.

. . . ..... ... . .. .I!.. . . . . Sigmund D. S c h u t z , E s q . - PL ~

ust,ce, ,.,I,, .<. ,I ,".I, , r~ \ _ L ~,, I, c~ ~ i l :,~,. i ~r~ it f ~i u ~ ~ ~ 1 . 1 , , , ~) nn I C , I

John McVeigh, Esq. - PIJ Jants 0aTtlett, Ess. - 111 I060lLJ6 I

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

~~Bluebook (online)~~

~~Supino v. Long Sands Grocery Store, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/supino-v-long-sands-grocery-store-mesuperct-2006.~~

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack