Supervisors of Washington County v. Lucas

30 Wis. 276
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Wis. 276 (Supervisors of Washington County v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Supervisors of Washington County v. Lucas, 30 Wis. 276 (Wis. 1872).

Opinion

Colb, J.

A motion is made to strike this cause from the calendar, for the following reasons: 1st, because the return had not been made and was not on file in this court, when the cause was noticed for argument, and 2d, because the return made by the clerk below to the writ of error, consists of the original papers, pleading, etc., instead of copies thereof as required by rules of this court.

The cause was improperly noticed for argument before the return was made. It was so decided in Eaton v. Tallmadge, 23 Wis., 443.

Rule 2 of this court provides, that on writs of error, the return of the clerk below shall consist of the writ of error, and a certified copy of the judgment record, consisting of the pleadings, the bill of exceptions — if any — the verdict and judgment. The record must be returned, in order to enable the clerk to comply with this rule.

By the Court. — The motion to strike the cause from the calendar, is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase v. Dearborn
23 Wis. 443 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Wis. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/supervisors-of-washington-county-v-lucas-wis-1872.