Superville v. State

642 So. 2d 1193, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9332, 1994 WL 525226
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1994·No. No. 94-1228·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

The order of the trial court adjudging appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt is reversed upon the authority of Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162, 86 S.Ct. 352, 15 L.Ed.2d 240 (1965) and Pendley v. State, 392 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent -with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Upon remand, should appellant be convicted of indirect criminal contempt, the maximum penalty imposed without trial by jury shall not exceed six months’ imprisonment. Martinez v. State, 339 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), affirmed, 346 So.2d 68 (Fla.1977); Butler v. State, 330 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 863, 97 S.Ct. 168, 50 L.Ed.2d 142 (1976).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Superville v. State, 642 So. 2d 1193, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9332, 1994 WL 525226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

642 So. 2d 1193 (Superville v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCrimager v. State
919 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)