Superior Laundry & Towel Supply Co. v. Cincinnati City

168 N.E.2d 447, 84 Ohio Law. Abs. 175, 11 Ohio Op. 2d 352, 1959 Ohio App. LEXIS 1406
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 18, 1959
DocketNo. 8730
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 N.E.2d 447 (Superior Laundry & Towel Supply Co. v. Cincinnati City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Superior Laundry & Towel Supply Co. v. Cincinnati City, 168 N.E.2d 447, 84 Ohio Law. Abs. 175, 11 Ohio Op. 2d 352, 1959 Ohio App. LEXIS 1406 (Ohio Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

This is an action by a taxpayer to enjoin the defendants as municipal officials from proceeding to exercise the right of eminent domain and from expending municipal funds in acquiring title to real estate to be used for parking purposes in an area near Crosley Field.

The defendants demurred generally and specifically to this petition. The court sustained the general demurrer, and, the plaintiff, not desiring to plead further, the court dismissed the action at plaintiff’s costs.

The plaintiff has appealéd to this court.

One of the most ancient and habitually exercised functions of government for centuries has been providing of roads and streets for use by the public and keeping them free from obstructions, regulating traffic over and upon them, so that the public might get the maximum of safe use thereof.

It is our opinion that the actions of the defendants of which the plaintiff complains is an exercise of this power of government, and that the plaintiff and those property owners whom it assumes to represent in this action hold their property subject to-the right of the government to take it for that purpose upon being paid just compensation, and that the expenditure of public funds for that purpose is an expenditure for a public purpose.

We approve the opinion of Judge Leis, the trial judge, and affirm the judgment.

MATTHEWS, FJ, LONG and O’CONNELL, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenko Corp. v. City of Cincinnati
917 N.E.2d 888 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 447, 84 Ohio Law. Abs. 175, 11 Ohio Op. 2d 352, 1959 Ohio App. LEXIS 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/superior-laundry-towel-supply-co-v-cincinnati-city-ohioctapp-1959.