Superior Consolidated Land Co. v. City of Superior

80 N.W. 739, 104 Wis. 463, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 306
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided November 7, 1899·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

MaRshall, J.

The appeal must be dismissed for want of a proper return. Sec. 3050, Stats. 1898, provides that on an appeal from an order the clerk shall transmit to the supreme [464] court, in addition to such order, the original papers used by each party on the application therefor, and, annexed thereto, a certificate under his hand and the seal of the court that they are the original papers or copies, as the case may be, and that they are transmitted pursuant to the appeal. The section further provides that copies of papers may be transmitted instead of the originals, by special direction of the ■court. The return before us fails to comply with the requirements indicated in several material particulars. The original complaint is not in the return, nor does it appear that the court directed a copy to be transmitted in place of .such original. It does not appear, either from the clerk’s certificate or from recitals in the order appealed from in connection with the papers transmitted, that the return contains the papers used by each party on the application for the order. Such defects are fatal to the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the appeal. Flanders v. Sherman, 19 Wis. 178; Carpenter v. Shepardson, 43 Wis. 406; Glover v. Wells & M. G. Co. 93 Wis. 13; Hoffman & B. Mfg. Co. v. Burdick, 95 Wis. 342; Tenney v. Madison, 99 Wis. 539.

By the Court.— The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Superior Consolidated Land Co. v. City of Superior, 80 N.W. 739, 104 Wis. 463, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 306 (Wis. 1899).

80 N.W. 739 (Superior Consolidated Land Co. v. City of Superior) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. City of Ashland
94 N.W. 292 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Garvin v. Crowley
93 N.W. 470 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Schomberg Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Engel
90 N.W. 177 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
Glassbrenner v. Groulik
85 N.W. 962 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)
Ryan v. Philippi
83 N.W. 1103 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)
Sutton v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
82 N.W. 137 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)