SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections

700 N.E.2d 619, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2979

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1998

Docket98-1940

StatusPublished

This text of 700 N.E.2d 619 (SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections, 700 N.E.2d 619, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2979 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Licking App. No. 97CA00131. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Licking County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs. Douglas, Acting C.J., Resnick and Cook, JJ., would deny the motion as moot. Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would grant the motion. Moyer, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Licking App. No. 97CA00131. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Licking County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs. Douglas, Acting C.J., Resnick and Cook, JJ., would deny the motion as moot. Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would grant the motion. Moyer, C. J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 N.E.2d 619, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1457, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/superamerica-group-v-licking-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-1998.