Super Vision Int'l Inc. v. Mega Int'l Commercial
This text of Super Vision Int'l Inc. v. Mega Int'l Commercial (Super Vision Int'l Inc. v. Mega Int'l Commercial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FILED No. 08-15031 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APRIL 17, 2009 THOMAS K. KAHN D. C. Docket No. 07-20907-CV-ASG CLERK
SUPER VISION INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MEGA INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK CO., LTD.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
(April 17, 2009)
Before BIRCH, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting defendant Mega
International Commercial Co., Ltd.’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff Super Vision
International, Inc.’s second amended complaint with prejudice.
A district court’s judgment of dismissal is subject to de novo review. See
Sosa v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., 348 F.3d 979, 983 (11th Cir. 2003).
After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the
benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of dismissal based on the district
court’s well-reasoned order filed on August 4, 2008.
AFFIRMED.1
1 Mega’s motion for double costs and attorneys’ fees is DENIED. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Super Vision Int'l Inc. v. Mega Int'l Commercial, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/super-vision-intl-inc-v-mega-intl-commercial-ca11-2009.