Super Stations, Inc. v. Ram, Inc.
185 So. 2d 748, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5293
Opinion
By this appeal, we are called upon to review the final decree rendered in a declaratory decree proceeding, adjudicating certain rights and responsibilities of parties to a lease agreement.
We affirm the action of the chancellor. It appears that the clause in dispute was ambiguous and the chancellor’s decree is amply supported by the evidence. There[749] fore, same should be affirmed. See: Rimer v. Mortgage Guarantee Corp., Fla. App.1964, 168 So.2d 549; Seiff v. Presto Brick Machine Corp., Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 700.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Super Stations, Inc. v. Ram, Inc., 185 So. 2d 748, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5293 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
185 So. 2d 748 (Super Stations, Inc. v. Ram, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rimer v. Mortgage Guarantee Corp.
168 So. 2d 549 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Seiff v. Presto Brick MacHine Corp.
168 So. 2d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)