Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Augusta Bag Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant

Federal Circuit

Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Augusta Bag Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant

6 F.3d 786, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23182

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 7, 1993

Docket93-1084

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 F.3d 786 (Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Augusta Bag Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Augusta Bag Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 6 F.3d 786, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23182 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

6 F.3d 786
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

SUPER SACK MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AUGUSTA BAG COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 93-1084, 93-1095.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1993.

Before PLAGER and RADER, Circuit Judges, and WOODS, District Judge*.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

*

Judge George E. Woods, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI