Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Augusta Bag Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant

6 F.3d 786, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23182
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 7, 1993·No. 93-1084·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

6 F.3d 786
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

SUPER SACK MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AUGUSTA BAG COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 93-1084, 93-1095.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1993.

Before PLAGER and RADER, Circuit Judges, and WOODS, District Judge*.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

*

Judge George E. Woods, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Augusta Bag Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 6 F.3d 786, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23182 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

6 F.3d 786 (Super Sack Manufacturing Corporation v. Augusta Bag Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related