Super Eight Motels v. Drolshagen

561 So. 2d 2, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309, 1990 WL 39864
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1990·No. No. 89-1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We decline to consider the issue raised by appellants regarding interest and penalties awarded by the Judge of Compensation Claims because appellants failed to set out the issue in the Notice of Appeal as required by Fla.W.C.R.P. 4.160. See Manns Jiffy Food Mart v. O’Neil, 453 So.2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We affirm the remaining issues raised on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Super Eight Motels v. Drolshagen, 561 So. 2d 2, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309, 1990 WL 39864 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 2 (Super Eight Motels v. Drolshagen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aguiar v. Doral Hotel & Country Club
599 So. 2d 698 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)