Suozzi v. Parente

161 A.D.2d 232, 554 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4888
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 1990·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered June 26, 1989, denying plaintiffs oral application for the 1986 income tax records of defendants DeRiggi and Reilly, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks the financial disclosure in this defamation action solely in support of his claim for punitive damages. Such discovery should await the return of a special verdict on the question of liability (Rupert v Sellers, 48 AD2d 265), and is inappropriate at this pretrial stage (Dufresne v Duemler, 108 AD2d 1102). At the very least, plaintiff must demonstrate some factual basis for his punitive damage claim before invading the financial privacy of the defendants (Moran v International Playtex, 103 AD2d 375). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Suozzi v. Parente, 161 A.D.2d 232, 554 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

161 A.D.2d 232 (Suozzi v. Parente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubin v. Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP
2025 NY Slip Op 31772(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Moye v. Mount Sinai Hosp.
188 N.Y.S.3d 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Maseto v. A.O. Smith Corp.
2022 NY Slip Op 06557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Sterling National Bank v. Ernst & Young LLP
62 A.D.3d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)