Suodor Al-Khair Co - SAKCO for General Trading

CourtArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals
DecidedMarch 21, 2016
DocketASBCA No. 59036, 59037
StatusPublished

This text of Suodor Al-Khair Co - SAKCO for General Trading (Suodor Al-Khair Co - SAKCO for General Trading) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suodor Al-Khair Co - SAKCO for General Trading, (asbca 2016).

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of -- ) ) Suodor Al-Khair Co - ) ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037 SAKCO for General Trading ) ) Under Contract No. W91GY0-08-C-0025 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Ahmed S. Najm Owner

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. Army Chief Trial Attorney Erica S. Beardsley, Esq. Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK DISMISSING THE APPEALS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

These appeals arise from the contract referred to above. As more fully described in the Board's prior ruling partially granting the government's motion to dismiss ASBCA No. 59036, and denying its motion to dismiss ASBCA No. 59037, appellant appeals from the contracting officer's denial of its claim for $72,077.33, and assertion of a claim against appellant for $65,763.13. See Suodor Al-Khair Co -SAKCO for General Trading, ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037, 15-1 BCA ~ 35,964. After that ruling was issued, the Board ordered the parties on 28 April 2015 to confer and jointly propose a schedule of proceedings. The government provided correspondence in response to that order on 27 May 2015. The Board ordered appellant to respond to that letter by 18 June 2015. Nothing was received. On 4 September 2015, the Board again ordered the parties to propose a schedule. On 7 October 2015, the government reported it had been unable to communicate with appellant and proposed its own schedule. On 10 November 2015, noting the government's statements, the Board ordered appellant to communicate whether it intended to continue pursuing these appeals. Nothing was received. On 2 February 2016, the Board issued an order to appellant to show cause by 12 February 2016 why these appeals should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Nothing has been received. Accordingly, under Board Rule 17 the appeals are dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Al Nawars Co., ASBCA No. 59044, 16-1 BCA if 36,234.

Dated: 21 March 2016

~~(_~~ MARK A. MELNICK Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

I concur

///? a~~-- / MARKN. s PLER 4i::I' RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037, Appeals of Suodor Al-Khair Co - SAKCO for General Trading, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Suodor Al-Khair Co - SAKCO for General Trading, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suodor-al-khair-co-sakco-for-general-trading-asbca-2016.