SUNTRUST BANK v. LILLISTON Et Al.

811 S.E.2d 80
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in SUNTRUST BANK v. LILLISTON Et Al.. Read the opinion of the Court — 338 Ga. App. 738
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 22, 2018·No. A16A1318·Published

Opinion

Branch, Judge.

In SunTrust Bank v. Lilliston , 338 Ga. App. 738 , 791 S.E.2d 614 (2016), this Court affirmed the trial court's ruling that the appellant had waived its right to arbitration in a renewed action by acting inconsistently with that right in the original action. The Supreme Court of Georgia granted certiorari and reversed our decision. See SunTrust Bank v. Lilliston , 302 Ga. 840 , 809 S.E.2d 819 (Case No. S17G0433, decided Jan. 29, 2018). We therefore vacate our previous opinion, adopt the decision of the Supreme Court as our own, and reverse the judgment below.

Judgment reversed.

Ellington, P. J., and Mercier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUNTRUST BANK v. LILLISTON Et Al., 811 S.E.2d 80 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

811 S.E.2d 80 (SUNTRUST BANK v. LILLISTON Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SUNTRUST BANK v. LILLISTON Et Al.
791 S.E.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
SunTrust Bank v. Lilliston
809 S.E.2d 819 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)