Suntrust Bank v. Doveview, LLC

976 A.2d 172, 2009 Del. LEXIS 321, 2009 WL 1886879
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 1, 2009
Docket366, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 976 A.2d 172 (Suntrust Bank v. Doveview, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suntrust Bank v. Doveview, LLC, 976 A.2d 172, 2009 Del. LEXIS 321, 2009 WL 1886879 (Del. 2009).

Opinion

SUNTRUST BANK, Plaintiff Below, Appellant,
v.
DOVEVIEW, LLC, Defendant Below, Appellee.

No. 366, 2009.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: June 29, 2009.
Decided: July 1, 2009.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER

HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice.

This 1st day of July 2009, it appears to the Court that:

(1) Plaintiff-appellant has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42 ("Rule 42"), to appeal from the Superior Court's interlocutory order entered on May 29, 2009. By order dated June 26, 2009, the Superior Court denied plaintiff-appellant's application for certification of an interlocutory appeal.

(2) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances.[1] In the exercise of its discretion, the Court has concluded that exceptional circumstances as would merit interlocutory review of the Superior Court's May 29, 2009 order do not exist in this case.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.

NOTES

[1] Del. Supr. Ct. R. 42(b), (d)(v).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
976 A.2d 172, 2009 Del. LEXIS 321, 2009 WL 1886879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suntrust-bank-v-doveview-llc-del-2009.