Suntree United Methodist Church v. Cowell

793 So. 2d 1063, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10731, 2001 WL 864304
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2001·No. No. 1D00-2839·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WEBSTER, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, we construe the “treatment” authorized in the order entered by the judge of compensation claims as intended to be limited to treatment necessarily related to the diagnostic evaluations authorized. See Gulf Life Ins. Co. v. Gennell, 666 So.2d 1017, 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (treatment may not be authorized for a condition before it is determined that the condition is causally related to the industrial accident). As so construed, the order authorizing diagnostic evaluations is affirmed. Because the judge of compensation claims determined that claimant was entitled to a reasonable attorney fee, but reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount, we lack jurisdiction to consider the propriety of that portion of the order. See Dep’t of Children & Families v. Monroe, 744 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (an order that merely determines entitlement to attorney fees, without setting an amount, is non-final and non-appealable).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Suntree United Methodist Church v. Cowell, 793 So. 2d 1063, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10731, 2001 WL 864304 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

793 So. 2d 1063 (Suntree United Methodist Church v. Cowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida's Natural Growers v. Childs
878 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Knowles v. Hennelly
793 So. 2d 1063 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)