Suntiger, Inc. v. Sunglass Products of California, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Suntiger, Inc. v. Sunglass Products of California, Inc.

202 F. App'x 454

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 4, 2006·No. No. 2006-1398·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The parties jointly move to dismiss and remand this appeal, due to settlement.

The court cannot both dismiss and remand the case because those are mutually exclusive actions. It is the court’s usual practice, when the parties have settled, to remand to the district court for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is denied.

(2) The motion to remand is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The parties jointly move to dismiss and remand this appeal, due to settlement.

The court cannot both dismiss and remand the case because those are mutually exclusive actions. It is the court’s usual practice, when the parties have settled, to remand to the district court for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is denied.

(2) The motion to remand is granted.

Suntiger, Inc. v. Sunglass Products of California, Inc., 202 F. App'x 454 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

202 F. App'x 454 (Suntiger, Inc. v. Sunglass Products of California, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.