Sunshine Farms, Inc. v. Ten Eyck

248 A.D. 814, 289 N.Y.S. 89, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7449

Opinion

Order appealed from by the defendants unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the defendants, and motion denied, for the reasons stated in Dairy Sealed, Inc., v. Ten Eyck [ante, p. 352], decided herewith, and appeal by plaintiff from said order dismissed. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sunshine Farms, Inc. v. Ten Eyck, 248 A.D. 814, 289 N.Y.S. 89, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 814 (Sunshine Farms, Inc. v. Ten Eyck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.