Sunshine Farms, Inc. v. Ten Eyck
248 A.D. 814, 289 N.Y.S. 89, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7449
Opinion
Order appealed from by the defendants unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the defendants, and motion denied, for the reasons stated in Dairy Sealed, Inc., v. Ten Eyck [ante, p. 352], decided herewith, and appeal by plaintiff from said order dismissed. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sunshine Farms, Inc. v. Ten Eyck, 248 A.D. 814, 289 N.Y.S. 89, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 814 (Sunshine Farms, Inc. v. Ten Eyck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.