Sunset Sanitation Service Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Smithtown

172 A.D.2d 755, 569 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5375
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 22, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 172 A.D.2d 755 (Sunset Sanitation Service Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Smithtown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sunset Sanitation Service Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Smithtown, 172 A.D.2d 755, 569 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Smithtown dated September 13, 1988, which declared that the petitioner’s resource recovery, separation and transfer facility was not a "non-nuisance industry” pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Smithtown, and therefore denied the petitioner’s application to build such a facility, the appeal, by permission, is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered June 16, 1989, which annulled the determination and remitted the matter to the appellants for rehearing.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Subsequent to the close of the public hearing on the petitioner’s application, the appellants received a Planning Advisory Report from the Town of Smithtown Planning and Community Development Department. This report gave a highly negative evaluation of the petitioner’s application, and in addition, set forth factual allegations in support of the conclusion that the petitioner’s facility "may be more appropriately classified as a junkyard than a non-nuisance industry”. Because the petitioner was not given the opportunity to rebut the new evidence contained in the report, which evidence was expressly relied upon by the appellants, the trial court properly ordered a rehearing in this matter (see, Stein v Board of [756]*756Appeals, 100 AD2d 590; see also, 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice § 25.14 [3d ed]). Lawrence, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of BKP Harrison, LLC v. Town/Vil. of Harrison
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Matter of Bali Two, LLC v. Pascale
2024 NY Slip Op 01303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Troy Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. v. Fleming
2017 NY Slip Op 9222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
CERTIFIED ROAD CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. TOWN OF RUSSIA ZONING BOARD OF APPE, ALS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Certified Road Constructors, Inc. v. Town of Russia Zoning Board of Appeals
133 A.D.3d 1278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
McAvoy v. Klein
117 A.D.3d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
31 Commerce Street, LLC v. Darden
50 A.D.3d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Hampshire Management Co. v. Nadel
241 A.D.2d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D.2d 755, 569 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunset-sanitation-service-corp-v-board-of-zoning-appeals-of-town-of-nyappdiv-1991.