Sunrise Financial, Inc. v. Painewebber, Inc.

164 F. Supp. 2d 1277, 2001 WL 1251693
District Court, D. Utah·Decided October 15, 2001·No. 2:96CV0060S·Published

Opinion

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT

KIMBALL, District Judge.

Having considered the Stipulation and Joint Motion to Vacate filed by plaintiff UTCO Associates, Ltd. (“UTCO”) and defendants PaineWebber, Inc. (“Paine-Webber”) and Pasquale A. Basile (“Ba-sile”), and good cause appearing therefore,

THE COURT ORDERS AND DECREES, that the Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Granting Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 7, 1998, the Amended Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Granting Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 18, 1998, and the Judgment entered on November 8, 2000, are hereby vacated as to UTCO only, including all *1278 findings of fact and conclusions of law therein with respect to UTCO and its principal, Robert Kent, only. This Order does not vacate the Memorandum Decisions or the Judgment with respect to Sunrise Financial or with respect to any persons or entities who assigned their claims to UTCO and/or Sunrise Financial. The clerk is directed to submit this Order for publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sunrise Financial, Inc. v. Painewebber, Inc., 164 F. Supp. 2d 1277, 2001 WL 1251693 (D. Utah 2001).

164 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (Sunrise Financial, Inc. v. Painewebber, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.