Sunrise Distributing Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 321, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1635
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 23, 1949
DocketNo. 53173; protests 108702-K/91502, etc. (Chicago)
StatusPublished
This text of 22 Cust. Ct. 321 (Sunrise Distributing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sunrise Distributing Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 321, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1635 (cusc 1949).
Opinion
Opinion by
For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 Cust. Ct. 321, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunrise-distributing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1949.