Sunrise Auto Partners, L. P. v. H.N. Frankel & Co.
683 N.E.2d 774, 90 N.Y.2d 842, 660 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2225
This text of 683 N.E.2d 774 (Sunrise Auto Partners, L. P. v. H.N. Frankel & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sunrise Auto Partners, L. P. v. H.N. Frankel & Co., 683 N.E.2d 774, 90 N.Y.2d 842, 660 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2225 (N.Y. 1997).
Opinion
[843]*843Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Under the particular circumstances of this case, neither implied severance nor party finality is applicable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
683 N.E.2d 774, 90 N.Y.2d 842, 660 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunrise-auto-partners-l-p-v-hn-frankel-co-ny-1997.