Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

Tenth Circuit

Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

287 F.2d 569

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 24, 1960·No. 6142·Published

Opinion

287 F.2d 569

SUNRAY MID-CONTINENT OIL COMPANY
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION.

No. 6142.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

October 24, 1960.

On petition for review and to modify an order of the Federal Power Commission.

Dale E. Doty, Washington, D. C., and M. Darwin Kirk, James C. Denton, Jr., and Homer E. McEwen, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner.

Willard W. Gatchell, General Counsel, and Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, Federal Power Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed on motion of respondent, counsel for petitioner consenting thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

287 F.2d 569

SUNRAY MID-CONTINENT OIL COMPANY
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION.

No. 6142.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

October 24, 1960.

On petition for review and to modify an order of the Federal Power Commission.

Dale E. Doty, Washington, D. C., and M. Darwin Kirk, James C. Denton, Jr., and Homer E. McEwen, Jr., Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner.

Willard W. Gatchell, General Counsel, and Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, Federal Power Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed on motion of respondent, counsel for petitioner consenting thereto.

Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 287 F.2d 569 (10th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

287 F.2d 569 (Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.