Sunnyside Irrigation District v. Stephens

Idaho Supreme Court

Sunnyside Irrigation District v. Stephens

120 P. 169, 21 Idaho 94, 1912 Ida. LEXIS 102

DecidedJanuary 2, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 120 P. 169 (Sunnyside Irrigation District v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sunnyside Irrigation District v. Stephens, 120 P. 169, 21 Idaho 94, 1912 Ida. LEXIS 102 (Idaho 1912).

Pincite

Opinions

SULLIVAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court confirming generally and specifically all acts and things done and performed by the board of county commissioners in the organization of the Sunnyside Irrigation District situated in "Washington county, and all acts and things done and performed by said district, and its board of directors, from the filing of the petition for the organization of said district up to the date of the filing of the petition for the confirmation of the organization of said district.

The petition for the confirmation of said district sets forth specifically the acts and things done in the organization of said district and the voting of $565,000 in bonds on said district, the amount determined to be necessary to carry out the said district’s plans. A demurrer to the petition was filed and overruled by the court and judgment of confirmation entered. Counsel for appellant assigns no specific errors of the trial court in its procedure or judgment, and it was conceded by counsel for respective parties that the irrigation district law has been complied with in every particular in the organization of said district and in the voting of said bonds. That being true, for the purposes of this case this court holds that all of the proceedings required by law to be taken and done in the organization of said district and in voting said bonds have been done, and that the judgment of confirmation entered by the district court must be sustained and the judgment affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs in favor of the respondent.

Stewart, C. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SULLIVAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court confirming generally and specifically all acts and things done and performed by the board of county commissioners in the organization of the Sunnyside Irrigation District situated in "Washington county, and all acts and things done and performed by said district, and its board of directors, from the filing of the petition for the organization of said district up to the date of the filing of the petition for the confirmation of the organization of said district.

The petition for the confirmation of said district sets forth specifically the acts and things done in the organization of said district and the voting of $565,000 in bonds on said district, the amount determined to be necessary to carry out the said district’s plans. A demurrer to the petition was filed and overruled by the court and judgment of confirmation entered. Counsel for appellant assigns no specific errors of the trial court in its procedure or judgment, and it was conceded by counsel for respective parties that the irrigation district law has been complied with in every particular in the organization of said district and in the voting of said bonds. That being true, for the purposes of this case this court holds that all of the proceedings required by law to be taken and done in the organization of said district and in voting said bonds have been done, and that the judgment of confirmation entered by the district court must be sustained and the judgment affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs in favor of the respondent.

Stewart, C. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 P. 169, 21 Idaho 94, 1912 Ida. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunnyside-irrigation-district-v-stephens-idaho-1912.