Sunny Electronics At World Wide Plaza, Inc. v. Ariel Custom Builders, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sunny Electronics At World Wide Plaza, Inc. v. Ariel Custom Builders, Inc.

285 A.D.2d 469, 727 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6906

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D.2d 469 (Sunny Electronics At World Wide Plaza, Inc. v. Ariel Custom Builders, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sunny Electronics At World Wide Plaza, Inc. v. Ariel Custom Builders, Inc., 285 A.D.2d 469, 727 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County [470]*470(Adams, J.), entered August 31, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

There is no merit to the petitioner’s contention that it did not participate in the arbitration proceeding. The record supports the finding of the Supreme Court contained in its decision dated June 18, 1999, that, inter alia, the petitioner was present at the arbitration proceeding and participated therein (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [2]; cf., Matter of Blamowski, 91 NY2d 190).

The petitioner’s remaining contention is without merit (see, Matter of Silverman, 61 NY2d 299). O’Brien, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County [470]*470(Adams, J.), entered August 31, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

There is no merit to the petitioner’s contention that it did not participate in the arbitration proceeding. The record supports the finding of the Supreme Court contained in its decision dated June 18, 1999, that, inter alia, the petitioner was present at the arbitration proceeding and participated therein (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [2]; cf., Matter of Blamowski, 91 NY2d 190).

The petitioner’s remaining contention is without merit (see, Matter of Silverman, 61 NY2d 299). O’Brien, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D.2d 469, 727 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunny-electronics-at-world-wide-plaza-inc-v-ariel-custom-builders-inc-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack