Sunkyung LLC v. Porto Resources, LLC

2016 NY Slip Op 8117, 145 A.D.3d 444, 41 N.Y.S.3d 707

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered April 3, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, plaintiff failed to submit uncontroverted evidence that defendants-respondents defaulted under the mortgage agreement (see JPMCC 2007-CIBC19 Bronx Apts., LLC v Fordham Fulton LLC, 84 AD3d 613 [1st Dept 2011]). Issues of fact are presented by the June 18, 2012 letter from plaintiff’s predecessor in interest (the bank) to defendant Joseph Porto setting forth the structure of the new loan term, and emails to Joseph Porto from defendants’ relationship manager at the bank stating that the extension had been approved.

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.