Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head

Fourth Circuit

Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head

50 F. App'x 116

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2002·No. No. 02-1629·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Heiko William Sunkler and Michelle Herron Sunkler appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head, No. CA-01-22 H (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Heiko William Sunkler and Michelle Herron Sunkler appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head, No. CA-01-22 H (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head, 50 F. App'x 116 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 116 (Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related