Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 7, 2002
• Docket: 02-1629
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1629

HEIKO WILLIAM SUNKLER; MICHELLE HERRON SUNKLER,

Plaintiff - Appellants,

versus

TOWN OF NAGS HEAD, Town of Nags Head, North Carolina; BRYAN R. SEAWELL, Individually and as a Nags Head Building Inspector; COURTNEY N. GALLOP, Individually and as a Nags Head Zoning Administrator; GARY R. FERGUSON, Individually and as Planning Director for the Town of Nags Head,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-01-22-H)

Submitted: October 28, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael B. Brough, THE BROUGH LAW FIRM, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellants. L. P. Hornthal, Jr., HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Heiko William Sunkler and Michelle Herron Sunkler appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sunkler v. Town

of Nags Head, No. CA-01-22-H (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED