Sunita Patel v. Maricopa County

585 F. App'x 452

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Sunita Patel appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Maricopa County and six individual Maricopa County Sheriffs Office deputies and officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to the Defendants-Ap-pellees. Under the totality of the circumstances known to the Deputy McGuire at the time of the arrest, a reasonable officer would believe that he or she had probable cause to arrest Patel for -willfully failing to comply with Lieutenant Brackman’s order to “clear the driveway.” Thus, the district court did not err in finding, as a matter of law, that Deputy McGuire had probable cause to arrest Patel.

As there was probable cause to arrest Patel for willfully failing to comply with an official order, the Court need not address qualified immunity or whether Deputy McGuire also had probable cause to arrest Patel for recklessly interfering with traffic on a public thoroughfare or highway. Torres v. City of Los Angeles, 548 F.3d 1197, 1207 (9th Cir.2008). In addition, Patel’s Monell and supervisory liability claims fail as there was no underlying constitutional violation.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees on all of Patel’s claims.

AFFIRMED

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.