Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 10, 2010·No. 04-09-00784-CV·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00784-CV

Sunil Ramchand SAMTANI, Appellant

v.

Ramakrishna CHERUKURI, Individually and as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc., Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CVQ-001100-D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 10, 2010

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a written notice advising the court that he filed in the trial court a notice

of nonsuit of the underlying cause and that this appeal is therefore moot. We construe the notice as

a motion to dismiss the appeal and grant the motion. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(a)(1). Because

appellant does not disclose an agreement between the parties regarding the assessment of costs, we 04-09-00784-CV

order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the

parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc. (Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.