Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc.
This text of Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc. (Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00784-CV
Sunil Ramchand SAMTANI, Appellant
v.
Ramakrishna CHERUKURI, Individually and as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc., Appellee
From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CVQ-001100-D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 10, 2010
MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED
Appellant has filed a written notice advising the court that he filed in the trial court a notice
of nonsuit of the underlying cause and that this appeal is therefore moot. We construe the notice as
a motion to dismiss the appeal and grant the motion. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(a)(1). Because
appellant does not disclose an agreement between the parties regarding the assessment of costs, we 04-09-00784-CV
order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the
parties, costs are taxed against appellant).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sunil Ramchand Samtani v. Ramakrishna Cherukuri, Individually as Representative of New York Fragrance, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sunil-ramchand-samtani-v-ramakrishna-cherukuri-ind-texapp-2010.