Sunil Kumar Mehta and Mehta Investments, Ltd. v. Mohammed Ahmed

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 2020·No. 01-20-00568-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Sunil Kumar Mehta and Mehta Investments, Ltd. v. Mohammed Ahmed

Appellate case number: 01-20-00568-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-84654

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

On October 7, 2020, Marc James Ayers filed an Unopposed Sworn Motion of Non- Resident Attorney for Admission Pro Hac Vice seeking admission to appear before the Court in this appeal on behalf of appellee, Mohammed Ahmed. Peter Scaff, local counsel for appellee, filed a Motion of Texas Attorney in support of the Mr. Ayers’s pro hac vice motion. The motion conforms to Rule XIX of the Texas Rules Governing Admissions to the Bar of Texas. See TEX. RULES GOVERN. BAR ADM’N R. XIX(a) (West 2018).

Accordingly, the unopposed motion for admission pro hac vice is granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Terry Adams_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __October 13, 2020____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sunil Kumar Mehta and Mehta Investments, Ltd. v. Mohammed Ahmed, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Sunil Kumar Mehta and Mehta Investments, Ltd. v. Mohammed Ahmed (Sunil Kumar Mehta and Mehta Investments, Ltd. v. Mohammed Ahmed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.