Sung Man Kim v. Chin Mo Mun

Fourth Circuit

Sung Man Kim v. Chin Mo Mun

25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20827, 1994 WL 251170

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1994

Docket94-1149

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1040 (Sung Man Kim v. Chin Mo Mun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sung Man Kim v. Chin Mo Mun, 25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20827, 1994 WL 251170 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Sung Man KIM, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Chin Mo MUN, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1149.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 1994.
Decided: June 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-93-1088, BK-92-12937)

Sung Man Kim, Appellant Pro Se.

Max Christian Dorian, Abramowitz & Dorian, Annandale, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's entry of default judgment against him and denying reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kim v. Mun, Nos. CA-93-1088; BK-92-12937 (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 1993 & Jan. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Sung Man KIM, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Chin Mo MUN, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1149.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 1994.
Decided: June 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-93-1088, BK-92-12937)

Sung Man Kim, Appellant Pro Se.

Max Christian Dorian, Abramowitz & Dorian, Annandale, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's entry of default judgment against him and denying reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kim v. Mun, Nos. CA-93-1088; BK-92-12937 (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 1993 & Jan. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20827, 1994 WL 251170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sung-man-kim-v-chin-mo-mun-ca4-1994.