Sung Kun Kim v. Panetta
This text of 516 F. App'x 268 (Sung Kun Kim v. Panetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Sung Kun Kim appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer in Kim’s action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kim v. Panetta, No. 1:11-cv-01370-LMB-TCB, 2012 WL 3600288 (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, [269]*2692012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 F. App'x 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sung-kun-kim-v-panetta-ca4-2013.